Richard Ruquist wrote:
Wrong. Renormalization multiples the total energy in the multiverse.

I can do no more than refer you to Frank Wilczek:

http://frankwilczek.com/2013/multiverseEnergy01.pdf

Bruce



On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Bruce Kellett <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Richard Ruquist wrote:



        On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Bruce Kellett
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:bhkellett@optusnet.__com.au
        <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:

            Bruno Marchal wrote:

                On 24 Nov 2014, at 11:35, Richard Ruquist wrote:

                    With MWI thinking, every detector will detect a
        photon at
                    the same energy and frequency as the original photon
        but in
                    a different world. So the total energy in the multiverse
                    will locally have increased by the number of
        detectors times
                    the photon energy. The only way to conserve energy is to
                    detect only one photon of the same energy and
        frequency as
                    the original photon.


                ... or the conservation of energy is something which has
        to be
                accounted in branches, not in the multiverse.



            I don't think so. The multiverse is described by the SWE,
        and that
            is just a unitary transformation in Hilbert space. It satisfies
            energy conservation by construction (time translation
        invariance and
            Noether's theorem).

            You have to renormalize in each branch to get the observed
            branch-wise energy conservation -- conservation is automatic
        only
            for the multiverse.


        Renormalization increases the energy of the multiverse. No
        conservation. No renormalization results in chaos.


    Renormalizing the (collapsed) wave function for a branch does not
    affect the wave function of the multiverse. The procedure is ugly,
    but doesn't lead to difficulties.

    Bruce

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to