On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> Of course, with my definition of unicorn, as *fictitious* objects, > belonging only to fairy tales, they don't exist, even in arithmetic. > A integer that was larger than 2 but smaller than 3 is 100% fictitious even in arithmetic, but would a white horse-like creature with a single horn like that of a narwhal be as fictitious as that, or would it be more like a fictionalized account of a true story that just happened to have a few composite characters? John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
