Alberto... you sound like someone who is convinced that the black helicopters
are coming for you. Since you seem to thrive on paranoia and fear, let me give
you some more fodder to fuel the mental fires of the paranoia squirming around
inside your mind.
Here is another scary fear your godless UN elites can enslave the masses with.
Gamma-Ray Burst Caused Mass Extinction?
| |
| | | | | | | |
| Gamma-Ray Burst Caused Mass Extinction?A stream of gamma rays aimed at Earth
may have caused a mass die-off 440 million years ago, according to a new paper
that says a similar celestial catastrophe could... |
| |
| View on news.nationalgeograph... | Preview by Yahoo |
| |
| |
From: Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]>
To: everything-list <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 3:45 AM
Subject: Re: real A.I.
There is hope anyway. For example slip the attention of the power hungry and
their pawns, the obsessive people with other menaces. For example, the possible
impact of an asteroid:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aGMDMNeWh0
To divert world efforts to create a body of the UN to conjure that menace. That
way the heads of state and the megaburocracies can meet, they can increase
taxes, they can marry their sons among them, the mases will be indoctrinated
and will be happy with the new fears watching the TV. scientifics that are
deniers of the asteroid consensus would be harrassed by prominent figures of
the mass media and everyone will be happy.
But I´m affraid that this would not work, unless the asteroid require harder
sacrifices to the political elite, more than taxes. for example blood
sacrifices. For example abortions in masse. That is the attractive of ecologism
and global warming: The commitment to the cause produced by blood sacrifices
and the consequent psychological slavement of women. Once you alienate women
from their men, you have enslaved a country.
2014-12-12 11:43 GMT+01:00 Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]>:
The key point is not energy, but power. Political power.
2014-12-12 7:20 GMT+01:00 John Clark <[email protected]>:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:41 PM, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
> We and other species could no doubt adapt to the much warmer climate of the
> Carboniferous era - but not in a few hundred years.
When things got super hot life adapted, and we're far more intelligent than
anything that lived during the Carboniferous and the specialty of intelligence
is being good at adapting quickly to changing environmental conditions.
> > Did that revelation come to you in a dream? You know why the Earth was
super cold 450 million years ago and super hot 360 million years ago and
everything in-between since?
> No it came to me reading about the Milankovich cycles.
Please explain how ether the 21,000 or 26,000 or 41,000 year Milankovitch cycle
can explain why the Earth was colder than it's ever been 450 million years ago
and hotter than any time in the last two billion years 360 million years ago.
>> No person who doesn't make his living feeding environmental panic says the
>> global temperature is going to rise 4.5degK anytime soon,
> It's the 95% upper confidence bound of the IPCC projection for 2100.
Bureaucratic agencies have a survival instinct, if people thought there was no
need to be in a environmental panic there would be no reason for a agency like
the IPCC to exist, and I don't give a damn if they're confident I only care if
they're correct and predictions about what things will be like in 85 years
almost never are. For heavens sake that's like demanding that the Wright
Brothers find a solution to airport congestion; if in 85 years global warming
turns out to be a real problem our toolkit for fixing things will be VASTLY
larger and more powerful than it is now, and in the meantime there are plenty
of more important problems that need fixing right now.
> Bullshit. You're just making up straw man "environmentalist". One of my
> close friends is president of the Sierra Club and he's *for* nuclear power.
We've been down this road before. I don't know who your mystery friend is but
I do know that the Sierra Club official website says:
"The Sierra Club remains unequivocally opposed to nuclear energy."
> And even those who are against it only hold that opinion because they think
> solar and wind can replace oil.
Then they are fools.
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Alberto.
--
Alberto.--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
