The permo-triassic extinction was caused by vulcanism (a superplume) in
Siberia. That is the most accepted hypothesis.

2014-12-12 22:36 GMT+01:00 LizR <[email protected]>:
>
> Has anyone noticed that it is almost exactly one galactic year since the
> Permian-Triassic extinction? (96% of marine and 70% of land life died - the
> only extinction event known to have wiped out insect species, apparently).
> So we're back in the same part of the galaxy as we were when it
> happened....last time....!
>
> Of course the galaxy is a dynamic thing and "the same part" loosely
> defined at best, but ... something else to worry about?
>
> :-)
>
>
> On 13 December 2014 at 10:26, Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> they are -> they have
>>
>> 2014-12-12 22:24 GMT+01:00 Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>> There are many kind of dumb people, but there are one kind of the
>>> dumbest ones, for which the  Western Wold  produce a massive surplus
>>> nowadays: the ones that think that, because they are born and they are so
>>> pretty and so nice and so intelligent, and because they are iphones, plasma
>>> TVs and documentaries about the universe, there would be no more
>>> dictatorships, no more deaths, no more hunger, no more turmoil in his
>>> country never forever again.
>>>
>>> 2014-12-12 21:02 GMT+01:00 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List <
>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>> Alberto... you sound like someone who is convinced that the black
>>>> helicopters are coming for you. Since you seem to thrive on paranoia and
>>>> fear, let me give you some more fodder to fuel the mental fires of the
>>>> paranoia squirming around inside your mind.
>>>>
>>>> Here is another scary fear your godless UN elites can enslave the
>>>> masses with.
>>>>
>>>> Gamma-Ray Burst Caused Mass Extinction?
>>>> <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/04/090403-gamma-ray-extinction.html>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [image: image]
>>>> <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/04/090403-gamma-ray-extinction.html>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gamma-Ray Burst Caused Mass Extinction?
>>>> <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/04/090403-gamma-ray-extinction.html>
>>>> A stream of gamma rays aimed at Earth may have caused a mass die-off
>>>> 440 million years ago, according to a new paper that says a similar
>>>> celestial catastrophe could...
>>>> View on news.nationalgeograph...
>>>> <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/04/090403-gamma-ray-extinction.html>
>>>> Preview by Yahoo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   ------------------------------
>>>>  *From:* Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]>
>>>> *To:* everything-list <[email protected]>
>>>> *Sent:* Friday, December 12, 2014 3:45 AM
>>>> *Subject:* Re: real A.I.
>>>>
>>>> There is hope anyway. For example slip the attention of the power
>>>> hungry and their pawns, the obsessive people with other menaces. For
>>>> example, the possible impact of an asteroid:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aGMDMNeWh0
>>>>
>>>> To divert world efforts to create a body of the UN to conjure that
>>>> menace. That way the heads of state and the megaburocracies can meet, they
>>>> can increase taxes, they can marry their sons among them, the mases will be
>>>> indoctrinated and will be happy with the new fears watching the TV.
>>>> scientifics that are deniers of the asteroid consensus would be harrassed
>>>> by prominent figures of the mass media and everyone will be happy.
>>>>
>>>> But I´m affraid that this would not work, unless the asteroid require
>>>> harder sacrifices to the political elite, more than taxes. for example
>>>> blood sacrifices. For example abortions in masse. That is the attractive of
>>>> ecologism and global warming: The commitment to the cause produced by blood
>>>> sacrifices and the consequent psychological slavement of women. Once you
>>>> alienate women from their men, you have enslaved a country.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-12-12 11:43 GMT+01:00 Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>> The key point is not energy, but power. Political power.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-12-12 7:20 GMT+01:00 John Clark <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:41 PM, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > We and other species could no doubt adapt to the much warmer climate
>>>> of the Carboniferous era - but not in a few hundred years.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> When things got super hot life adapted, and we're far more intelligent
>>>> than anything that lived during the Carboniferous and the specialty of
>>>> intelligence is being good at adapting quickly to changing environmental
>>>> conditions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  > > Did that revelation come to you in a dream? You know why the
>>>> Earth was super cold 450 million years ago and super hot 360 million years
>>>> ago and everything in-between since?
>>>>
>>>>  > No it came to me reading about the Milankovich cycles.
>>>>
>>>> Please explain how ether the 21,000 or 26,000 or 41,000 year
>>>> Milankovitch cycle can explain why the Earth was  colder than it's
>>>> ever been 450 million years ago and hotter than any time in the last two
>>>> billion years 360 million years ago.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >> No person who doesn't make his living feeding environmental panic
>>>> says the global temperature is going to rise 4.5degK anytime soon,
>>>>
>>>>  > It's the 95% upper confidence bound of the IPCC projection for
>>>> 2100.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bureaucratic agencies have a survival instinct, if people thought there
>>>> was no need to be in a environmental panic there would be no reason
>>>> for a agency like the IPCC to exist, and I don't give a damn if they're
>>>> confident I only care if they're correct and predictions about what things
>>>> will be like in 85 years almost never are. For heavens sake that's like
>>>> demanding that the Wright Brothers find a solution to airport congestion;
>>>> if in 85 years global warming turns out to be a real problem our toolkit
>>>> for fixing things will be VASTLY larger and more powerful than it is now,
>>>> and in the meantime there are plenty of more important problems that need
>>>> fixing right now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > Bullshit.  You're just making up straw man "environmentalist".  One
>>>> of my close friends is president of the Sierra Club and he's *for* nuclear
>>>> power.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We've been down this road before.  I don't know who your mystery friend
>>>> is but I do know that the Sierra Club official website says:
>>>>
>>>> "The Sierra Club remains unequivocally opposed to nuclear energy."
>>>>
>>>> > And even those who are against it only hold that opinion because they
>>>> think solar and wind can replace oil.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Then they are fools.
>>>>
>>>>   John K Clark
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alberto.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alberto.
>>>>  --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alberto.
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alberto.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>


-- 
Alberto.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to