Has anyone noticed that it is almost exactly one galactic year since the
Permian-Triassic extinction? (96% of marine and 70% of land life died - the
only extinction event known to have wiped out insect species, apparently).
So we're back in the same part of the galaxy as we were when it
happened....last time....!

Of course the galaxy is a dynamic thing and "the same part" loosely defined
at best, but ... something else to worry about?

:-)


On 13 December 2014 at 10:26, Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> they are -> they have
>
> 2014-12-12 22:24 GMT+01:00 Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]>:
>>
>> There are many kind of dumb people, but there are one kind of the dumbest
>> ones, for which the  Western Wold  produce a massive surplus nowadays: the
>> ones that think that, because they are born and they are so pretty and so
>> nice and so intelligent, and because they are iphones, plasma TVs and
>> documentaries about the universe, there would be no more dictatorships, no
>> more deaths, no more hunger, no more turmoil in his country never forever
>> again.
>>
>> 2014-12-12 21:02 GMT+01:00 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List <
>> [email protected]>:
>>>
>>> Alberto... you sound like someone who is convinced that the black
>>> helicopters are coming for you. Since you seem to thrive on paranoia and
>>> fear, let me give you some more fodder to fuel the mental fires of the
>>> paranoia squirming around inside your mind.
>>>
>>> Here is another scary fear your godless UN elites can enslave the masses
>>> with.
>>>
>>> Gamma-Ray Burst Caused Mass Extinction?
>>> <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/04/090403-gamma-ray-extinction.html>
>>>
>>>
>>> [image: image]
>>> <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/04/090403-gamma-ray-extinction.html>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Gamma-Ray Burst Caused Mass Extinction?
>>> <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/04/090403-gamma-ray-extinction.html>
>>> A stream of gamma rays aimed at Earth may have caused a mass die-off 440
>>> million years ago, according to a new paper that says a similar celestial
>>> catastrophe could...
>>> View on news.nationalgeograph...
>>> <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/04/090403-gamma-ray-extinction.html>
>>> Preview by Yahoo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   ------------------------------
>>>  *From:* Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]>
>>> *To:* everything-list <[email protected]>
>>> *Sent:* Friday, December 12, 2014 3:45 AM
>>> *Subject:* Re: real A.I.
>>>
>>> There is hope anyway. For example slip the attention of the power hungry
>>> and their pawns, the obsessive people with other menaces. For example, the
>>> possible impact of an asteroid:
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aGMDMNeWh0
>>>
>>> To divert world efforts to create a body of the UN to conjure that
>>> menace. That way the heads of state and the megaburocracies can meet, they
>>> can increase taxes, they can marry their sons among them, the mases will be
>>> indoctrinated and will be happy with the new fears watching the TV.
>>> scientifics that are deniers of the asteroid consensus would be harrassed
>>> by prominent figures of the mass media and everyone will be happy.
>>>
>>> But I´m affraid that this would not work, unless the asteroid require
>>> harder sacrifices to the political elite, more than taxes. for example
>>> blood sacrifices. For example abortions in masse. That is the attractive of
>>> ecologism and global warming: The commitment to the cause produced by blood
>>> sacrifices and the consequent psychological slavement of women. Once you
>>> alienate women from their men, you have enslaved a country.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-12-12 11:43 GMT+01:00 Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>> The key point is not energy, but power. Political power.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-12-12 7:20 GMT+01:00 John Clark <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:41 PM, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> > We and other species could no doubt adapt to the much warmer climate
>>> of the Carboniferous era - but not in a few hundred years.
>>>
>>>
>>> When things got super hot life adapted, and we're far more intelligent
>>> than anything that lived during the Carboniferous and the specialty of
>>> intelligence is being good at adapting quickly to changing environmental
>>> conditions.
>>>
>>>
>>>  > > Did that revelation come to you in a dream? You know why the Earth
>>> was super cold 450 million years ago and super hot 360 million years ago
>>> and everything in-between since?
>>>
>>>  > No it came to me reading about the Milankovich cycles.
>>>
>>> Please explain how ether the 21,000 or 26,000 or 41,000 year
>>> Milankovitch cycle can explain why the Earth was  colder than it's ever
>>> been 450 million years ago and hotter than any time in the last two billion
>>> years 360 million years ago.
>>>
>>>
>>> >> No person who doesn't make his living feeding environmental panic
>>> says the global temperature is going to rise 4.5degK anytime soon,
>>>
>>>  > It's the 95% upper confidence bound of the IPCC projection for 2100.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bureaucratic agencies have a survival instinct, if people thought there
>>> was no need to be in a environmental panic there would be no reason for
>>> a agency like the IPCC to exist, and I don't give a damn if they're
>>> confident I only care if they're correct and predictions about what things
>>> will be like in 85 years almost never are. For heavens sake that's like
>>> demanding that the Wright Brothers find a solution to airport congestion;
>>> if in 85 years global warming turns out to be a real problem our toolkit
>>> for fixing things will be VASTLY larger and more powerful than it is now,
>>> and in the meantime there are plenty of more important problems that need
>>> fixing right now.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > Bullshit.  You're just making up straw man "environmentalist".  One of
>>> my close friends is president of the Sierra Club and he's *for* nuclear
>>> power.
>>>
>>>
>>> We've been down this road before.  I don't know who your mystery friend
>>> is but I do know that the Sierra Club official website says:
>>>
>>> "The Sierra Club remains unequivocally opposed to nuclear energy."
>>>
>>> > And even those who are against it only hold that opinion because they
>>> think solar and wind can replace oil.
>>>
>>>
>>> Then they are fools.
>>>
>>>   John K Clark
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alberto.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alberto.
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>>
>>>   --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alberto.
>>
>
>
> --
> Alberto.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to