On 04 Jan 2015, at 09:29, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2015 7:59 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Why is there something rather than nothing? From quantum theory to dialectics?


On 03 Jan 2015, at 07:17, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:




From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of meekerdb
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2015 9:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Why is there something rather than nothing? From quantum theory to dialectics?

On 1/2/2015 9:05 PM, 'Roger' via Everything List wrote:
Even if the word "exists" has no use because everything exists, it seems important to know why everything exists. How is it that a thing can exist? What I suggest is that a grouping defining what is contained within is an existent entity. Then, you can use this to try and answer the other question of "Why is there something rather than nothing?".

If everything exists, what doesn't exist?  Nothing.

If nothing existed; would it remain nothing?

Careful not confusing "Nothing exists" and "Nothing exist".

In the first case, something exists. But not necessarily in the second case.

Okay… I see you point. “Nothing Exist” is a hard abstraction to wrap the mind around and the mind will try like hell to give nothing a kind of existence because it is so impossibly hard to even imagine the former.

The passge from "nothing exist" to "nothing exists", is the passage from a level to the metalevel. Then you can apply the "reflexion axiom", and oput that nothing in the real of what exist.
In that case you generate the von Neuman Kuratowski numbers:

1)
2) {}
3) { {} }
4) { {} {{}} }
5) { {} {{}} {{}{{}}}

Which can represent the natural numbers, or the ordinals, in set theory

1)
2) {} = 0
3) {{}} = 1 = {0}
4) { {} {{}} } = {0, 1} = 2
5) { {} {{}} {{}{{}}}  = {0, 1, 2} = 3
...
omega) { {} {{}} {{}{{}} { {} {{}} {{}{{}}} ...} = {0, 1, 2, 3, ...} = N omega+1 = { {} {{}} {{}{{}} { {} {{}} {{}{{}}} ... { {} {{}} {{}{{}} { {} {{}} {{}{{}}} ...} } = N union {N}
etc.

This "etc" leads to Cantor ordinal





Of course not everything exists a priori. There is no divisors of zero different from zero,

>>nor is there a cat-dog,

Not yet in our universe, but what about in fifty years from now would it remain beyond our technical reach to fuse the DNA of a cat and a dog to create this radical hybrid? Would it always fight with itself… would it bark or meow J
I take your point however.

nor is there a triangle with four sides.


Then with mechanism, we can, assume that what exist are simply the numbers 0, s(0), s(s(0)), etc.

I don’t think you are referring to set notation.. the empty set being {}. So by “s(0)” do you mean an operation taking zero? A specific operation perhaps: 0, sum(0), sum(sum(0)) etc. ?
It seems so but I am not sure.

s(0) = the successor of 0  (= 1)
s(s(0)) = the successor of the successor of 0 = the successor of 1 = 2
etc.

0 and s are primitive symbol of the arithmetical language.

All what is asked is the satisfaction of some axioms like

n = m implies s(n) = s(m)
s(n) = s(m) implies n = m
0 ≠ s(n) for all n


Then all the rest, God included, is part of a persistent number hallucination, but "hallucination" should not be used as "unreal", because the hallucination is real, and is what makes our lives, and there is no reason to dismiss them at all.

The math makes this clear too by distinguish the

ontical existence  Ex P(x)  and only 0, s(0), ... exists in that sense

and the many and quite variate rich phenomenological existence: whcih are obtained with the modal points of view, like []Ex[]P(x), with [] being the box of self-reference logic and its many intensional variants (which distinguish basicall all science (biology, psychology, physics, even theology).

It is intuitive to me how a vastly deep self-referential recursion of math could generate all manner of sublime subtle effects at some far remove from the basic fundamental math underlying the self- referential edifice.

OK. And with computationalism, that exists provably in the arithmetical reality.

Bruno

-Chris

Bruno










-Chris

Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to