If only through the "we" which think about that nothing. > > > Is anything possible at all without an observer? > > -Chris > > Roger: If we're talking about the situation where there's only the > "absolute lack-of-all" or the "empty set", I think the only place the > perspective/observer is coming from is from our thinking about this > situation after the fact. In the case of the "absolute lack-of-all", or > "empty set", there is no observer. There's a difference between our mind's > conception of the "absolute lack-of-all" or "empty set" and the "absolute > lack-of-all" or "empty set" itself, IMHO. >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
