IBM's Watson: http://bigthink.com/videos/ibms-watson-cognitive-or-sentient-2
Samiya On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote: > If you define increased intelligence as decreased probability of having a > false belief on any randomly chosen proposition, then superintelligences > will be wrong on almost nothing, and their beliefs will converge as their > intelligence rises. Therefore nearly all superintelligences will operate > according to the same belief system. We should stop worrying about trying > to ensure friendly AI, it will either be friendly or it won't according to > what is right. > > I think chances are that it will be friendly, since I happen to believe in > universal personhood, and if that belief is correct, then > superintelligences will also come to believe it is correct. And with the > belief in universal personhood it would know that harm to others is harm to > the self. > > Jason > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I can´t even enumerate the number of ways in which that article is wrong. >> >> First of all, any intelligent robot MUST have a religion in order to act >> in any way. A set of core beliefs. A non intelligent robot need them too: >> It is the set of constants. The intelligent robot can rewrite their >> constants from which he derive their calculations for actions and if the >> robot is self preserving and reproduce sexually, it has to adjust his >> constants i.e. his beliefs according with some darwinian algoritm that must >> take into account himself but specially the group in which he lives and >> collaborates.. >> >> If the robot does not reproduce sexually and his fellows do not execute >> very similar programs, it is pointless to teach them any human religion. >> >> These and other higher aspects like acting with other intelligent beings >> communicate perceptions, how a robot elaborate philosophical and >> theological concepts and collaborate with others, see my post about >> "robotic truth" >> >> But I think that a robot with such level of intelligence will never be >> possible. >> >> 2015-02-09 21:59 GMT+01:00 meekerdb <[email protected]>: >> >>> >>> In two senses of that term! Or something. >>> >>> http://bigthink.com/ideafeed/robot-religion-2 >>> >>> http://gizmodo.com/when-superintelligent-ai-arrives- >>> will-religions-try-t-1682837922 >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Everything List" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Alberto. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Everything List" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
