On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 5:33 PM, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
> I like Graziano's theory of consciousness. > He says consciousness is just another name for attention, but computers have been paying attention to some things and not others form almost as long as they've existed. For example the LHC produces nearly a billion particle collisions per second and each collision produces about one megabyte of data, so you'd need 200,000 DVDs each second the LHC is in operation to store that much information, and it's designed to be in operation 20 hours a day 300 days a year. Even a computer can't remember all that, Instead the computers looks at each collision and quickly decides if there is anything that *might* be worthy of its attention and remembers only them. So out of the billion collisions each second the computer only remembers and pays attention to what happened in about 200 collisions, all the other data is just thrown away. Even so that's still a HUGE amount of information to store. There is always the possibility you're throwing away something important but there is no alternative, you just can't keep it all. > under Graziano's theory it's a way of augmenting or improving > intelligence within constraints of limited computational resources. Is so then it would be easier to make a intelligent conscious computer than a intelligent non-conscious computer. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
