On 3/8/2015 7:33 AM, John Clark wrote:


On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 11:52 PM, meekerdb <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        >> He [Graziano]says consciousness is just another name for attention, 
but computers
        have been paying attention to some things and not others form almost as 
long as
        they've existed. For example the LHC produces nearly a billion particle
        collisions per second and each collision produces about one megabyte of 
data, so
        you'd need 200,000 DVDs each second the LHC is in operation to store 
that much
        information, and it's designed to be in operation 20 hours a day 300 
days a
        year. Even a computer can't remember all that, Instead the computers 
looks at
        each collision and quickly decides if there is anything that *might* be 
worthy
        of its attention and remembers only them.
        So out of the billion collisions each second the computer only 
remembers and
        pays attention to what happened in about 200 collisions, all the other 
data is
        just thrown away. Even so that's still a HUGE amount of information to 
store.
        There is always the possibility you're throwing away something 
important but
        there is no alternative, you just can't keep it all.


    > As I understand it the proper analogy would not be selecting which 
collisions to analyze in real time, it would
    be a level up from that: managing the allocation computer resources (most 
of which
    are off the LHC site) to the selection process.


I don't understand your distinction. The LHC just can't record a billion collisions a second, it can only remember about 200 and even that takes a herculean effort, so it uses a fast but very well crafted algorithm to pick out the 200 out of that billion that seem most interesting to it and pays attention only to them. Likewise when you spot a Saber Toothed Tiger you pay attention only to the sense data that is related to the tiger, so even though it's within your field of view you ignore the fact that your shoes don't seem to be polished. And it's the same with internal signals, you stop thinking about Plato's philosophy and stop reminiscing about the birthday party you had when you were ten the instant you spot the tiger and devote the entire computational resources of your brain to matters that you judge to be of more immediate concern.

But, as I understand Graziano, consciousness consists in having another higher level model that can record that you're now paying attention to the tiger. So afterward you can report,"And that's when I noticed the tiger and..."

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to