> On 30 Mar 2015, at 11:19 am, LizR <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 30 March 2015 at 08:39, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On 3/29/2015 3:55 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>>>> Please! "Hunter Gatherers" - "warriors" is a boys' club term for it.
>>> 
>>> I can accept that the term "warrior" glorifies something nasty, but what 
>>> term to use? "Hunter Gatherer" is not what I mean.


But that's what you are. You go to the supermarket, don't you?



>>> I refer to the people who directly confront other groups in battles to the 
>>> death.


Them? They're just idiot warmongers like the brutes they are confronting. Takes 
one to know one. As soon as you have "my tribe" you also unfortunately have 
"not in my tribe". Besides, some of them only may be warriors. Most are likely 
twelve pound weaklings who were hit over the head in the middle of the night 
and told they had this brilliant career ahead of them in the armed forces.
Isn't that how you raise an army?




>>> Men are naturally more suited for this sort of thing due to endocrine 
>>> system differences, that leads to bigger bodies, more muscles and more 
>>> aggression.

This last being in fact the dominant characteristic which means it should come 
at the head of your list. Men are sacks of testosterone and adrenalin. Add to 
that the limited reach of human perception and you can find yourself in a 
pitched battle at the drop of a hat, particularly where the tension is already 
high. 

One of the job requirements for joining ISIS is that you are able to squirt 
testosterone out of one ear and adrenalin out the other. What real warriors 
these guys are!!!

>> 
>> I think it's silly to say "warrior" glorifies something nasty. 


Yet there may be good reasons for sending up the concept as I am doing. I mean, 
warriors can be good boys or bad boys. I take it that there are three kinds of 
warriors: good, bad and imbecilic. These are tribes too and cut across the 
other tribal, clan lines. You might be a lowly footsoldier, though a good and 
trusted son of the Empire while your commanding officer is a rapist and a 
murdering despot that everyone would prefer to see deposed.

I also take it that the badder the boy, the better the warrior. Kind of 
axiomatic. All the guys who beat me up in the playground in Primary school 
later on in life became cops! Go figure. Warriors do a dirty job - they're like 
cleaners. They do what you and I are simply not tooled-up well enough to do 
ourselves. Besides I can't squirt anything out of my ears. When some thug comes 
into my shop and points a gun at my head and I blow him away, that makes me a 
warrior, right? But he was a warrior too, see: it was on his teeshirt; he saw 
himself as fighting for some cause, so he is now a martyr.



>> That's a politically correct judgement looking back at a different era 
>> through current glasses. 


I am looking at the present era. The concept of "warrior" has never evolved in 
meaning. Today's warriors are grunts doing a dirty job just as they always did.



>> Having good warriors was sometimes the difference between survival and 
>> extinction. 


That's right. And when the war is over, the warriors get together to form a 
junta which kicks out the useless government that led to the conflict in the 
first place and they then install a military dictatorship. Once a warrior 
always a warrior. "The way of the warrior" in fact. You never give up on power.

Kim



>> Is what the men did in holding Bastogne "nasty"?


They were attacked. I'm sure they did many nasty things in the course of 
defending it. Get over being nasty already. Warriors are nasty bastards.

K

> 
> Absolutely. If all men were cooperative then a single defector could rule the 
> world, or at least make out like a bandit. Hence we have what I think is 
> called a Nash equilibrium?
>  
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to