> On 12-May-2015, at 4:00 pm, John Mikes <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Russel wrote:
> 
> Nondeterministic systems needn't have free will.
> 
> then:
> 
> My point still stands, though. We were discussing the dynamical chaos
> Og was seeing, and Laplace's daemon, which operates in a deterministic 
> setting. 
> 
> The term 'nondeterministic' (leading to 'random?') is a nono in my views (and 
> I do not argue for their correctness, only for their LIMITED agnostic 
> nature). 
> Relations (what are they?) influence each other, I think so does the Laplace 
> daemon (I never met this guy) so in the churnings of the existence (Nature?) 
> nothing comes un-influenced (randomly, or in a CHAOTIC un-ruliness).
> I consider chaos the outcome of orderly influences including (our) unknown - 
> even (for us) unknowable factors in the 'Everything' (Nature, whatever). 
> Furthermore: if chaos is ubiquitous, or: if random prevails unrestrained, we 
> would have no math-phys laws to observe (consider 2+2=375, or 56831) and e.g. 
> Ohm's law would be unfollowable etc. etc. etc. 
> 
> So far I did not meet an acceptable regulation about WHERE does the potential 
> of random, or chaos prevail and WHERE not? It cannot be a convenience rule, 
> like: "it exists there, and ONLY there, where we like it 
> and it does not disturb our natural sciences/mathematics etc. "
> 
> A 'deterministic setting' IMO is the outcome of sometimes controversial 
> trends from diverse influencing tendencies - ALL OF THEM (known and unknown). 
> Whatever 'emerges' is entailed by some origins and influences and it is only 
> our ignorance that calls it 'random', 'chaos', or 'nondeterministic change' 
> etc. etc. 
> 
> In many cases we cannot predict what will happen, because our insight is 
> limited. 'Free will' is a good cop-out, the gods can even punish the 
> 'willer'. 
> 
This might be of interest: 
Tracking the Unconscious Generation of Free Decisions Using UItra-High Field 
fMRI:http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0021612 
And my understanding of it: 
http://signsandscience.blogspot.com/2014/08/divine-will-and-human-free-will.html

Samiya 

> Regards
> 
> John Mikes
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Russell Standish <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:06:57PM -0400, John Mikes wrote:
>> > Russell:
>> > you wrote (among many many others):
>> >
>> > *"...No free will = deterministic behaviour..." *
>> >
>> > I would not equal the two in my agnostic views. There are lots of (known as
>> 
>> Quite right. I should have written "No free will <= deterministic behaviour."
>> 
>> (<= means "entailed by", not ≤).
>> 
>> Nondeterministic systems needn't have free will.
>> 
>> My point still stands, though. We were discussing the dynamical chaos
>> Og was seeing, and Laplace's daemon, which operates in a deterministic 
>> setting.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
>> Principal, High Performance Coders
>> Visiting Professor of Mathematics      [email protected]
>> University of New South Wales          http://www.hpcoders.com.au
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to