LizR wrote:
On 6 June 2015 at 07:22, John Clark <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 , meekerdb <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            > > It's very relevant if you want to know what is a
            simplified approximation of what. And we both agree that a
            electronic computer is vastly more complex than it's logical
            schematic, so why can we make a working model of the complex
            thing but not make a working model of the simple thing when
            usually it's easier to make a simple thing than a complex
            thing? The only answer that comes to mind is that particular
            simplified approximation is just too simplified and just too
            approximate to actually do anything. That simplification
            must be missing something important, matter that obeys the
            laws of physics.

        >  The trouble with this argument is that the laws of physics are
        mathematical abstractions.

    Mathematicians are always saying that mathematics is a language, but
what would be the consequences if that were really true? I'm not sure that mathematicians say this (well, Galileo did, iirc, but generally they don't). The best way known to describe the laws of physics is to write then
    in the language of mathematics, but a language is not the thing the
    language is describing. A book about Napoleon may be written in the
    English Language, but the English Language is not Napoleon and
    mathematics may not be the physical universe.  Or maybe it is. As
    I've said many times I'm playing devil's advocate here, maybe
    mathematics really is more fundamental than physics but if it is it
    has not been proven.

I doubt anything could prove this if it's still being debated even though physics has been based on maths for 300 years.

I think you will find that physics has been based on experience, and the the experience/experiments have been codified/described by mathematics. To say that is "has been based on maths" is a gross distortion of the facts.

Bruce

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to