Oh I'd enjoy that test! :) But I'd enjoy even more administering it to John 
Clarke. I suspect I already know the result however.

On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 10:09:42 AM UTC+10, Kim Jones wrote:
>
> OK - perhaps this post is not entirely serious. I don't actually know.
>
> There appears to be no reliable test of idiocy. Even people who invite 
> others to participate in games of running along a lawn while a drone fires 
> rockets at them may not actually qualify, ultimately, as idiots. 
>
> It may be that the true definition of an idiot (in the theological, not 
> medical sense) is one who is incorrigible in their beliefs. 
>
> If you never change your mind, why have one? 
>
> The hallmark of a true idiot is one who never admits they are wrong about 
> something even in the face of massive counterfactual evidence and the 
> weight of opinion thrown against them. 
>
> So what, I hear you say. Idiots clearly exist. 
>
> Trouble is, we need this test as I said above. You don't want idiots in 
> government you don't want idiots as scientists and you certainly don't want 
> idiots running your local church.
>
> On the basis of this argument you would, for example, still want to keep 
> drugs illegal - for idiots. Anyone who could reliably prove they were not 
> an idiot could still use drugs. Idiots get orange juice and huge injections 
> of vitamins. Or something.
>
> The test would therefore be to administer a standard dose of Salvia 
> Divinorum after which the person would be interviewed.
>
> The box marked 'idiot' would be ticked in the case where the subject 
> maintained with the same or increased fervour, the beliefs they held prior 
> to taking the test. Those who come through the experience with changed or 
> clearly modified beliefs would be classed as normal.
>
> Obviously the people conducting the interview would be 'normal'.
>
> Any takers? 
>
>
>
> Kim Jones B. Mus. GDTL
>
> Email:   [email protected] <javascript:>
>              [email protected] <javascript:>
> Mobile: 0450 963 719
> Phone:  02 93894239
> Web:     http://www.eportfolio.kmjcommp.com
>
>
> *"I'm not saying there aren't a lot of dangerous people out there. I am 
> saying a lot of them are in government" - Russell Brand*
>
>  
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to