Brent: who said I require "rules"? In a wishful state of democracy people would live in freedom (free to do what they like (including helping others and solvin occasional problems?) as long as it does not inflict onto the 'freedom' of others. A very idealistic evolutionary dream, of which Lenin concluded that to implement (he spoke about 'communism' in a similar sense) that kind of society a NEW TYPE HUMAN has to evolve (he called it "communist man"). Such evolvement *cannot be orchestrated* by (majority?) rules and not by a government of old-fashioned (capitalistic? self-centered and growth-related - I mean gowth of their private wealth - upper class, involved* in* any ongoing politics) *existing societies*. But to dream about it is free. JM
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 9/27/2015 12:55 PM, John Mikes wrote: > > Bruno, it seems I cannot shake you out from the 'classical' format that > -WHOEVER (Nominative, not: "whomever" which is Accusative) *lies* > himself into getting the (questionable?) majority of the voting population > (and THEN can do WHATEVER his interest dictates - in the name of such > majority - ) > means *D E M O C R A C Y *. NO, it does not. You may call it a > distortion, or any political malaise, but democracy (the cratos of the > demos) is the rule of the (entire) population, not a select majority only, > leaving any size of minority suppressed in the system. > It is not timely, to implement such system in our (ongoing) World. - So be > it. - I try to keep the vocabulary clean and do not compromise for ongoing > corruptions. > > > That's not even a system. Rule by the entire population would require the > entire population to agree on rules. As Lyndon Johnson once said, "If two > people agree on everything only one of them is doing the thinking." A > democracy necessarily must have some way of deciding rules that people do > not all agree on. Majority vote seem to be the only workable one; although > there are many variants to deal with multiple choices (plurality, ranking, > run-offs...). The way to avoid suppression of minorities is to limit the > range of action of the government. Define individual rights which are > beyond the reach of majority vote. > > Brent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
