On 01 Oct 2015, at 21:17, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 10/1/2015 9:44 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Oct 2015, at 17:54, John Clark wrote:
> Many worlds is nothing more than a hypothetical construct.
True.
Nice we all agree!
Note that one world is as much an hypothetical construct.
No, you can kick it and it kicks back.
That illustrates the existence of a physical reality, but that cannot
count as an argument for its uniqueness, nor for its primitive or
prior fundamental existence. On the contrary, QM and computationalism
can both be used to argue of the consistency of either the 0 physical
universes hypothesis (there would be only a first person sharable
"video game") or for the many worlds hypothesis (like Everett,
Dewitt, ...).
Bruno
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
