On 7/10/2015 5:30 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 6 October 2015 at 16:54, Bruce Kellett <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
It is possible that you might be able to make copies -- you
certainly can for AI. A copy means that information from the
original was used to construct the copy.
Where I use "copy" you might use a different word. Let's define
"doppelganger" as something which resembles the original arbitrarily
closely but was not constructed using information from the original,
while a "copy" is the same except constructed using information from
the original. Using these definitions, are you saying that if you are
replaced by a copy you will survive, whereas if you are replaced by a
doppelganger you will not?
I am saying, among other things, that you cannot establish that such
'doppelgangers' exist. Even if you had a purported doppelganger, you
could not establish that is was identical to you.
Theorizing on the basis of such doppelgangers is unsound.
Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.