*[Philip Benjamin*] *Implications of Bio Dark-Matter Chemistry Publications listed elsewhere* Laws of chemistry are universal and invariable and applicable to *atomic* dark matter also. So are the effects under analogous conditions. Animal and vegetable life (genetics) have extensive influence over chemistries. They suspend them, change them or traverse them to produce an innumerable number of products essential for life and adapted to the purpose of survival. Some of these processes are known and many often unknown and beyond laboratory capabilities.
*Bio Dark Matter Chemistry:* *Light Matter *+ Chemistry--> Perishable Body. *Dark Matter *+ *Dark Chem*. --> Durable Invisible Body. Dark/Light Chem. Bond Dissociation --> Dissonance, Disease, Death *"Bio Dark-Matter Chemistry", International Journal of Current Research and Reviews Vol 4 issue 20, 2012.* *ISSN: 0975-5241* * "Spiritual Body or Physical Spirit? Bio Dark-Matter Chemistry & Your Invisible Doppelganger". Sunbury Press, PA. February 2013. ISBN: 978-1-62006-182-4* *http://biodarkmatter.webs.com* <http://biodarkmatter.webs.com/> *Philip Benjamin PhD MSc MA* *Discover magazine *quotes a Harvard theoretical physicist positing dark-life from dark-matter. *http://discovermagazine.com/2013/julyaug/21-the-possible-parallel-universe-of-dark-matter* <http://discovermagazine.com/2013/julyaug/21-the-possible-parallel-universe-of-dark-matter> *Researchgate *quotes physicist G. K. Ustinova of Rusian Academy of Science indicating that* bio dark-matter chemistry *offers a new fruitful direction of investigation in this enigmatic field.( https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_spirit_our_energy_Is_spirit_dark_energy). *http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2009/sep/21/is-dark-matter-mostly-dark-atoms* *1. David Kaplan et al *(Johns Hopkins U) conclude from "new observational and experimental data" that dark matter exists as *composite particles *– atoms of dark protons and dark electrons that are acted on by [*dark photons*] the dark-matter equivalent of the electromagnetic force". This is based on the data of Neal Weiner and David Tucker-Smith in 2001, *2.* "*Daniel Hooper,* an astrophysicist at Fermilab in the US, affirms that the atomic dark-matter model is really viable and that all the lingering doubts "are resolved fairly easily." *3. Christopher Wells (*Kaplan's colleague) sees here the "additional benefit of bringing dark matter more into line with the ordinary matter that we are familiar with". *Note:* They claim that "dark hydrogen atoms could bind to form hydrogen molecules and that the formation of these molecules could then lead to the creation of "*dark stars* " or other compact objects and add that the interaction of dark photons with ordinary photons could lead to emission lines in the spectra of cosmic gamma rays". *Implications of Dark-matter Chemistry* 1. Laws of chemistry are the same universally in *light-m*atter and *dark-matter *(only *ab initio* computational chemistries). 2. Dark-matter chemistry/genetics begins *at the moment of conception* just as light-matter chemistry/genetics leading to an invisible doppelganger identical/eidetic to the visible body at all stages of human development (*en-dark-body-ment, endarkbodiment*). 3. Dark-matter body may be invisible to electromagnetic tools including the senses in their normal state of existence. 4. Dark and light chemical bonds have similar properties, interact with each other, rotate, vibrate, oscillate, have reciprocal motion, stretch, contract, have resonance structures, associate, dissociate, bend and break. These cause weak changes in energetics resulting in emission of weak photons known as biophotons. The sudden burst of biophotons at the moment of death of plant and animal cells results from the breaking of the coupling forces. OBE/NDE phenomena depend on the extent of “bond-dissociation”. 5. Dark-matter bodies may be non-entropic, enduring for ever 6. Enduring dark-bodies need no reproductive capabilities, hence are asexual 7. Enduring Dark-matter beings may exist and may be visible as an eerie biophotonic manifestation at appropriate excited energy states by internal or external mechanisms . 8. *Dark-matter beings can indwell/permeate light matter bodies, possessing and exhibiting any uncanny characteristic they may have.* 9. *Biophoton *emission rates differing by an order of magnitude across the taxa may be explained from the taxon-dependent weak changes in energetics resulting from interactions of *light/dark chemical bonds. *Dark matter bodies may be incomplete and less stable in animals and plants Different biophoton emission rates across the taxa. That indicates greater reactivity (or instability) at the source of emission; plant cells emit 10 times more than human/*sq.in*/per *s.* Greater is the instability, greater the emission rate. 10. In an early termination of pregnancy in humans, a durable and precocial *bio dark-matter twin*, co-created at the moment of conception, can survive the altricial *light-matter twin*. When decoupled at death the *bio dark-matter body *will be relatively at a negative energy state by -E = mC^2 where m is the dead body mass. That will be the magnitude of the threshold external energy needed to raise the *bio dark matter body *to any functional state (Physical *resurrection* for example). *Best regards Philip Benjamin* On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 1:31:39 AM UTC-5, stathisp wrote: > > > > On 6 October 2015 at 16:54, Bruce Kellett <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> On 6/10/2015 3:59 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote: >> >> On 6 Oct 2015, at 11:48 AM, Bruce Kellett < <javascript:> >> [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: >> >> I agree that duality is a bad idea. Local copies are one thing. Remote >> copies with no possible connection are another. I do not know what it means >> to say that such things reproduce the same consciousness. That is a claim >> that can never be checked, and has no possible consequences. So Occam's >> razor comes into play. >> >> >> Do you doubt that mental states can be duplicated by duplicating the >> physical configuration of a brain? Do you think the duplication would work >> if information is transmitted from original to copy but not if the copy was >> made without such information, even though the physical configurations are >> exactly the same? That would imply that two brains could be exactly the >> same physically but differ mentally, which contradicts the physical >> supervenience thesis. This would be a dualist position. >> >> It is possible that you might be able to make copies -- you certainly can >> for AI. A copy means that information from the original was used to >> construct the copy. >> > > Where I use "copy" you might use a different word. Let's define > "doppelganger" as something which resembles the original arbitrarily > closely but was not constructed using information from the original, while > a "copy" is the same except constructed using information from the > original. Using these definitions, are you saying that if you are replaced > by a copy you will survive, whereas if you are replaced by a doppelganger > you will not? > > >> >> If there are, by chance, other persons who happen to have, >> instantaneously, the same brain configuration as you do, then there are >> simply two people who share a momentary psychological similarity. Since the >> environments are different, these two individuals will have had different >> histories, and will rapidly diverge. So calling one the continuation of the >> other is a bit arbitrary -- neither is a continuation of anything other >> than themselves. If the similarity is such that the universes are >> identical, as well as chance brain states, then it may take a little longer >> for the divergence, but you still always have two separate individuals with >> only chance similarities. Neither is a "copy" of the other. >> > > > You will diverge from whatever physical and mental state you were headed > towards if there is a small environmental change, but this does not kill > you. All future versions of yourself branching out from the present are > valid. > > >> >> So I am saying that two brains could be the same physically, and >> mentally, but still be different people. There is no duality here. The >> physical supervenience thesis requires that physical and mental processes >> track each other one-for-one. But similar mental states do not mean >> identical persons. >> > > If two brains are physically and mentally the same then they are at that > point the same person, but if they diverge they are different people from > then on. > > >> >> This is a consequence of the theory of personal identity. If you have a >> tie for closest continuer, you have created two new persons. And it does >> not matter what these persons think, or what conclusion they reach by >> introspection. Physical factors are more important in such cases than >> psychological factors. >> > > "Closest Continuer" is not *the* theory of personal identity, it is *a* > theory. > > >> >> One trouble with the idea of copies of you in other parts of the >> multiverse is that most such copies will not be identical -- they may pass >> through the same conscious state at a particular moment, but because they >> are in different environments, they will immediately diverge. The only >> sensible interpretation of such a situation is that there are other >> independent beings who are similar to you in some ways. That is the case >> anyway, and we do not necessarily believe in panpsychism. If there are >> identical copies, then they necessarily exist in identical environments, >> and anything that happens to you will also happen to them. So they do not >> provide a means for your consciousness to continue -- if you die, your >> identical copy also dies. >> >> >> Copies that start off identical diverging does not present a problem. >> There is a chance that you will experience any of the possible worlds >> branching from your present one, and if you die at one location you will >> only experience the worlds where copies of you survive. >> >> No *you* won't. Other persons who resemble you to a greater or lesser >> extent might. But if there is another identical with you, they necessarily >> die when you do. Quantum suicide is a no-brainer! >> Recall that in quantum many worlds, the different worlds are different, >> by construction. So continuations in the different worlds are always >> different - they get different results from the quantum experiment. >> > > If you are to be killed if a radioisotope decays, then one version of you > is killed, and the other version is not. You survive as the version that is > not killed. This is equivalent to being destructively copied into the world > where the isotope does not decay. > > > > -- > Stathis Papaioannou > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
