On 11/3/2015 1:50 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 02 Nov 2015, at 11:23, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 2/11/2015 7:10 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 02 Nov 2015, at 06:17, Bruce Kellett wrote:
Which is just your idiosyncratic way of saying that we have to
apply a projection operator.
No, we have to recover the "projection operator" from the
computationalist quantization. It is a math problem.
So do it.
That has been the subject of the PhD thesis. I can explain all the
detail, but you will need to invest more time in computer
science/mathematical logic. It is not a simple problem. UDA took a
flash in my childhood, AUDA took 30 years of works (in part because
some people makes me doubt of some results or conjecture I made for
years, until I saw them solved and published by others, to which I
refer. The problem now is that those interested in metaphysics seem to
be not enough patient to do the math. Philosophy attracts often people
who dislike a lot math and "exact" science. My whole main point is
that with computationalism, the mind body problem is translated into a
problem in math.
And the solution is given by the
[i]<i>p, p sigma_1, with i = 1, 2, 3, and [1]p = []p & p, [2]p = []p &
<>t,
and [3]p = [2]p & p (and [] is Gödel's beweisbar, and <>t = ~[]~t =
~[]f).
The solution to what? And what does it mean "given by".
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
