Hi Bruce, Interesting, thanks! I really agree with her that for such a theory to be successful, it must be possible to derive general relativity up to some precisions...
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> wrote: > Telmo, > > You might be interested in this comment by Sabine Hossenfelder on the > Verlinde paper: > > http://backreaction.blogspot.com.au/2016/12/can-dark-energy-and-dark-matter-emerge.html > > Bruce > > > On 2/12/2016 10:51 pm, Telmo Menezes wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Telmo Menezes <[email protected]> >>> To: everything-list <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Wed, Nov 30, 2016 3:33 pm >>> Subject: No gravity / no dark matter >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> What do you guys think of this? >>> >>> >>> http://bigthink.com/paul-ratner/remarkable-new-theory-says-theres-no-gravity-no-dark-matter-and-einstein-was-wrong >>> >>> Cheers >>> Telmo. >>> >>> >>> It's a respectable theory, but Verlinde needs to work out some testable >>> consequences. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
