On 14 Sep 2017, at 13:22, ronaldheld wrote:
This should cause some discussion. Maybe belongs in the "is math
real" thread, but that one is large??
Ronald
What is your opinion?
The author believes that PI does not existed 100,000 years ago.
It looks like he believes that 100,000 existed 100,000 years ago,
making hard for me to understand why PI would not exist, and in which
sense, as PI is not a function of time.
Then the author seems to believe in a primary physical universe, and
does not seem aware that this is an assumption too, and indeed
arguably much stronger than assuming arithmetic.
The main problem is that the author does not put its assumption on the
table, and take for granted that existence is physical existence. That
does not make sense with mechanism (probably), but to be franc, I am
not sure this makes sense even without mechanism. He confuses also
mathematical theory and mathematical reality, it seems.
What do *you* think? What would be your primary assumption?
My feeling is that it is a waste of time to guess what exists or not
before saying what we are willing to assume as primitively true, or
what is the metaphysical background accepted.
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
<1709.03087.pdf>
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
