On Thursday, September 14, 2017 at 8:01:16 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 14 Sep 2017, at 13:22, ronaldheld wrote:
>
> This should cause some discussion. Maybe belongs in the "is math real" 
> thread, but that one is large??
>                Ronald
>
>
> What is your opinion?
>
> The author believes that PI does not existed 100,000 years ago. 
>
> It looks like he believes that 100,000 existed 100,000 years ago, making 
> hard for me to understand why PI would not exist, and in which sense, as PI 
> is not a function of time.
>
> Then the author seems to believe in a primary physical universe, and does 
> not seem aware that this is an assumption too, and indeed arguably much 
> stronger than assuming arithmetic.
>
> The main problem is that the author does not put its assumption on the 
> table, and take for granted that existence is physical existence. That does 
> not make sense with mechanism (probably), but to be franc, I am not sure 
> this makes sense even without mechanism. He confuses also mathematical 
> theory and mathematical reality, it seems.
>
> What do *you* think? What would be your primary assumption?
>
> My feeling is that it is a waste of time to guess what exists or not 
> before saying what we are willing to assume as primitively true, or what is 
> the metaphysical background accepted. 
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <javascript:>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> <1709.03087.pdf>
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
> Well, his use of 100000 years does not fit with some little things he 
> states.  I am not the best person to comment, one because we should get 
> more opinions.  AFAIK his view is that mathematics (applied) does not fit 
> the "real world" as well as others have claimed. he also assumes that 
> lesser animals cannot do any math besides counting low integers. 
>
                  Ronald 
     

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to