It would make it possible to use EPR like experiments to send signals
faster than light...which is to say backward in time. That would pretty
much screw up all known physics...and common sense.
Brent
On 11/9/2017 7:43 AM, [email protected] wrote:
If the measurement problem were solved in the sense being able to
predict exact outcomes, thus making QM a deterministic theory, would
that imply an INCONSISTENCY in the postulates of QM? TIA.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
