On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:46 PM, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:43 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> If the measurement problem were solved in the sense being able to predict >> exact outcomes, >> > > That's not the measurement problem, its determining if how and why > observation effects things. > Not to split hairs, but why we get what we get in quantum measurements, and how measurement outcomes come to be what they are, are the same problem IMO. > > > >> thus making QM a deterministic theory, would that imply an INCONSISTENCY >> in the postulates of QM? >> > > It's not just Quantum Mechanics, Bell proved that any theory that is > deterministic must be nonlocal or non realistic or both, otherwise it > would be inconsistent with experimental results. > > John K Clark > > > > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > topic/everything-list/j3RV_cLRfts/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
