On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:43 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > If the measurement problem were solved in the sense being able to predict > exact outcomes, >
That's not the measurement problem, its determining if how and why observation effects things. > > thus making QM a deterministic theory, would that imply an INCONSISTENCY > in the postulates of QM? > It's not just Quantum Mechanics, Bell proved that any theory that is deterministic must be nonlocal or non realistic or both, otherwise it would be inconsistent with experimental results. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
