On Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 5:20:51 PM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 11:16:07 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > > On Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 9:47:37 PM UTC, Bruce wrote: > > > Collapse would be non-linear and non-unitary -- > intrinsically non-reversible. This is not necessarily a problem since there > are plenty of non-linearities in physics. It has nothing to do with hidden > variables. > > *Why would it be non linear? Brent claimed (on page 1)* > > > Page 1 of what? > > Weinberg looked into nonlinear QM, and it went nowhere. The linearity of QM is one thing that makes it so bizarre. If you make QM nonlinear you tend to make it obey Bell inequalities.
LC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
