On Saturday, April 28, 2018 at 5:44:20 PM UTC, scerir wrote: > > > https://physics.aps.org/articles/v1/34 > > http://a-c-elitzur.co.il/site/siteArticle.asp?ar=206 > > https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.22.879 >
I have two questions, on a personal note and curiosity. 1) Generally speaking, at what level do you understand the content of your links, on a scale of 0 to 100, 100 being full comprehension? I find them difficult and think I should start my study of QM from the beginning, using the link Brent gave me about tensors, which is part of an excellent course at MIT. 2) Is your life as a farmer in Italy finished? AG > > Il 28 aprile 2018 alle 18.39 [email protected] <javascript:> ha > scritto: > > Is it a settled issue whether measurements in QM are strictly > irreversible, that is irreversible in principle, or just statistically > irreversible, that is, reversible but with infinitesimal probability? TIA, > AG > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > <javascript:>. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
