> On 14 Jun 2018, at 05:30, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 6/13/2018 4:30 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
>> 
>> Physical Theories, Eternal Inflation, and Quantum Universe 
>> <https://arxiv.org/abs/1104.2324>, Yasunori Nomura
>> 
>> We conclude that the eternally inflating multiverse and many worlds in
>> quantum mechanics are the same. Other important implications include: global 
>> spacetime
>> can be viewed as a derived concept; the multiverse is a transient phenomenon 
>> during the
>> world relaxing into a supersymmetric Minkowski state. We also present a 
>> theory of “initial
>> conditions” for the multiverse. By extrapolating our framework to the 
>> extreme, we arrive at a
>> picture that the entire multiverse is a fluctuation in the stationary, 
>> fractal “mega-multiverse,”
>> in which an infinite sequence of multiverse productions occurs.
>> 
>> "Therefore, we conclude that the multiverse is the same as (or a specific 
>> manifestation
>> of ) many worlds in quantum mechanics.”


I tend to agree with this. I have used multiverse, like Deutsch, always in the 
sense of Everett Many-Worlds, with some nuances like “‘many consistent relative 
 histories” à la Griffith and Omnes. But with quantum cosmology, the 
many-worlds can lead to “many universes” in a more concrete sense, which should 
not be confused with the interpretation of quantum mechanics itself, but of 
general relativity when quantised in a way or in another.



> 
> That makes the multiple universes hidden variables. So they must interact 
> (non-locally) else they are rule out by Bell theorem violations.

Maybe, if the nuances between cosmology and the quantum are not addressed. 
Normally the Everett “many-worlds” do not interact at all (that would be non 
local indeed), but interfere statically, like mechanism predicts in arithmetic.

Bruno




> 
> Brent
> 
>> 
>> "In eternal inflation, however, one first picks a causal patch; then one 
>> looks for observers in it.” Our framework does not follow this approach. We 
>> instead pick an observer first, and then construct the relevant spacetime 
>> regions associated with it.
>> 
>> Instead of admitting the existence of the “beginning,” we may require that 
>> the quantum observer principle is respected for the whole history of 
>> spacetime. In this case, the beginning of our multiverse is a fluctuation of 
>> a larger structure, whose beginning is also a fluctuation of an even larger 
>> structure, and this series goes on forever. This leads to the picture that 
>> our multiverse arises as a fluctuation in a huge, stationary 
>> “megamultiverse,” which has a fractal structure."
>> 
>> The Multiverse Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics 
>> <https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.3796>, Raphael Bousso and Leonard Susskind
>> 
>> In both the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics and the 
>> multiverse
>> of eternal inflation the world is viewed as an unbounded collection of 
>> parallel universes.
>> A view that has been expressed in the past by both of us is that there is no 
>> need to
>> add an additional layer of parallelism to the multiverse in order to 
>> interpret quantum
>> mechanics. To put it succinctly, the many-worlds and the multiverse are the 
>> same
>> thing [1].
>> 
>> Jason
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
>> <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
> <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to