> On 15 Aug 2018, at 12:22, [email protected] wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 9:58:57 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 14 Aug 2018, at 22:12, Brent Meeker <[email protected] <javascript:>> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 8/14/2018 3:54 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> How do you explain interference fringes in the two slits? How do you > >> explain the different behaviour of u+d and a mixture of u and d. > >> > >> If the wave is not real, how doe it interfere even when we are not there? > > > > How does it interfere with itself unless it goes through both slits in the > > same world...thus being non-local. > > The wave is a trans-world notion. You should better see it as a wave of > histories/worlds, than a wave in one world. I don’t think “one world” is well > defined enough to make sense in both Everett and Mechanism. > > If you start with the error that all possible results of a measurement must > be realized, you can't avoid many worlds.
A(u+d) = A-see-u u + A-see-d d, and without collapse, you get both Alice's (A) experience realised in the wave. If from “A-see-u u + A-see-d d” you select one branch, you are using the collapse axiom. > Then, if you fall in love with the implications of this error, you are firmly > in woo-woo land with the prime directive of bringing as many as possible into > this illusion / delusion. This is where we're at IMO. AG No. I expected this to happens in case mechanism is true, without the need of any books in physics, or observation (other than amoebas). All computations are emulated in arithmetic. Just this is enough to doubt there is even one physical universe. In fact, when I read the book in physics, I ahem thought that the collapse postulate was a physical facts. It looks me to read EPR and Everett to realise that the physical reality looks so much like Mechanism predicts it should be. The fact that arithmetic semantically emulated all computations is known since the 1930s, but apparently still ignored by most. Bruno > > Bruno > > > > > > > Brent > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Everything List" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > <javascript:>. > > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list > > <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout > > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list > <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
