> On 15 Aug 2018, at 12:36, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 10:22:40 AM UTC, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 9:58:57 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> 
> > On 14 Aug 2018, at 22:12, Brent Meeker <[email protected] <>> wrote: 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On 8/14/2018 3:54 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: 
> >> How do you explain interference fringes in the two slits? How do you 
> >> explain the different behaviour of u+d and a mixture of u and d. 
> >> 
> >> If the wave is not real, how doe it interfere even when we are not there? 
> > 
> > How does it interfere with itself unless it goes through both slits in the 
> > same world...thus being non-local. 
> 
> The wave is a trans-world notion. You should better see it as a wave of 
> histories/worlds, than a wave in one world. I don’t think “one world” is well 
> defined enough to make sense in both Everett and Mechanism. 
> 
> If you start with the error tGhat all possible results of a measurement must 
> be realized, you can't avoid many worlds. Then, if you fall in love with the 
> implications of this error, you are firmly in woo-woo land with the prime 
> directive of bringing as many as possible into this illusion / delusion. This 
> is where we're at IMO. AG
> 
> Truthfully, I don't know why, when you do a slit experiment one particle at a 
> time, the result is quantum interference. It might be because particles move 
> as waves and each particle goes through both slits. In any event, I don't see 
> the MWI is a solution to this problem. It just takes us down a deeper rabbit 
> hole. AG

Everything is in the formalism, as well exemplified by the two slits. If you 
miss this, then consider the quantum algorithm by Shor. There, a “particle” is 
not just going through two slits, but participate in parallel, yet different 
computations, and we get an indirect evidence by the information we can extract 
from a quantum Fourier transform on all results obtained in the parallel 
branches. 

If you can explain all this without FTL in one unique physical reality, then 
write a paper and publish, you will be famous.

Bruno





>  
> 
> Bruno 
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > Brent 
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Everything List" group. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> > email to [email protected] <>. 
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <>. 
> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
> > <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>. 
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
> <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to