On Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 7:39:40 PM UTC, [email protected] wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 11:49:04 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 15 Aug 2018, at 12:36, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 10:22:40 AM UTC, [email protected] 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 9:58:57 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > On 14 Aug 2018, at 22:12, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote: 
>>>> > 
>>>> > 
>>>> > 
>>>> > On 8/14/2018 3:54 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: 
>>>> >> How do you explain interference fringes in the two slits? How do you 
>>>> explain the different behaviour of u+d and a mixture of u and d. 
>>>> >> 
>>>> >> If the wave is not real, how doe it interfere even when we are not 
>>>> there? 
>>>> > 
>>>> > How does it interfere with itself unless it goes through both slits 
>>>> in the same world...thus being non-local. 
>>>>
>>>> The wave is a trans-world notion. You should better see it as a wave of 
>>>> histories/worlds, than a wave in one world. I don’t think “one world” is 
>>>> well defined enough to make sense in both Everett and Mechanism. 
>>>>
>>>
>>> *If you start with the error tGhat all possible results of a measurement 
>>> must be realized, you can't avoid many worlds. Then, if you fall in love 
>>> with the implications of this error, you are firmly in woo-woo land with 
>>> the prime directive of bringing as many as possible into this illusion / 
>>> delusion. This is where we're at IMO. AG *
>>>
>>
>> *Truthfully, I don't know why, when you do a slit experiment one particle 
>> at a time, the result is quantum interference. It might be because 
>> particles move as waves and each particle goes through both slits. In any 
>> event, I don't see the MWI is a solution to this problem. It just takes us 
>> down a deeper rabbit hole. AG*
>>
>>
>> Everything is in the formalism, as well exemplified by the two slits. If 
>> you miss this, then consider the quantum algorithm by Shor. There, a 
>> “particle” is not just going through two slits, but participate in 
>> parallel, yet different computations, and we get an indirect evidence by 
>> the information we can extract from a quantum Fourier transform on all 
>> results obtained in the parallel branches. 
>>
>> If you can explain all this without FTL in one unique physical reality, 
>> then write a paper and publish, you will be famous.
>>
>
> *In the singlet non locality scenario, it does appear as if information 
> moves FTL, from one subsystem to another. However, when you consider that 
> what is instantaneously changing is the wf, which exists in the complex 
> plane, it is arguable that any kind of velocity is involved. AG *
>

*Yes, maybe I should be famous. I think your confusion involves the meaning 
of FTL, or indeed any velocity when discussing a change in a wf in response 
to a measurement. As previously stated, the wf exists in the complex plane, 
so it's a fallacy to consider the wf changing at any velocity when it 
doesn't exist in the real plane (or real volume if using 3 dimensional 
space). AG* 

>
>
>> Bruno
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>>>
>>> Bruno 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > 
>>>> > Brent 
>>>> > 
>>>> > -- 
>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Everything List" group. 
>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>> send an email to [email protected]. 
>>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. 
>>>> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. 
>>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>>>>
>>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to