On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 1:24 PM Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
*>If someone else can explain the problem that John Clark see, let him or > her helps him.* > So even the originator of the theory can't make sense out of it and asks third parties to figure out exactly what the question asked of the guy in Helsinki on Monday is that is supposed to be refuted on Tuesday. You keep telling us what the question is not but you never said what the question IS. And yes you say the question is about various sorts of peepee but I don't want to know what the question is about either, I want to know THE EXACT WORDING of the question asked of the guy on Monday and the exact wording of the answer, and I want all of this done without personal pronouns that do nothing but hide major blunders in your logic. I want that but I won't get that because you can't do that because your theory is so bad it's not even wrong. > *All points below have been answered,* > Except for who the referent is for all those personal pronouns you love to throw around so loberally and what the question asked in Helsinki is, not what it isn't, not what it's about, but exactly what IS it. > *I think John Clark do just very bad philosophy, asking impossible but > irrelevant precision,* > And so we have the sorry spectacle of a logician who likes to sprinkle formal equations in his posts complaining that I'm being too precise when all I ask is the meaning of a few pronoun and the wording of the question you keep talking about. John K Clark > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
