> On 29 Dec 2018, at 15:33, Lawrence Crowell <goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I urge caution with anything Tipler writes. In looking at this paper it is > clearly long, but at least not mathematically dense. I am not sure what he > means in the abstract by saying the CMBR is SU(2)_L. > > If you want to look at ideas that connect mathematics and number theory to > physics I would consider the Langlands program. Also the partition of > integers by Brunier and Ono, how many ways can the integer N be derived by > the addition of smaller integers, leads to mock Ramanjuan forms and ways that > quantum states may be integrated in partition functions or path integrals. I > think the fundamental set of quantum state have some Godel number > relationship with the zeros of the Riemann zeta function.
String theory has also deep relations with Number theory, and the physical smells in every part of Number theory. The boson string theory can be use to make new original proof in Number theory. I suspect that the distribution of the prime numbers might encapsulate the whole Turing complexity of numbers, and that could, if RH is correct, makes the zeros of Riemann zeta function into the spectrum of a universal quantum dovetailer. The Riemann zeta function is already able to emulate all analytical functions in subparts of its domain (a result obtained by Voronin). Yet, to get the qualia, it is better to derive this from the self-reference logic. Integers partition is a fascinating subject indeed. Probably more easy than the Langlands program. Knot theory is also very important to study the role of math in physics, independently of mechanism. With mechanism, knot theory should emerge from some “Reidemester moves” hidden (I suppose) in the grading of the material hypostases (as we get an infinity of similar, but different quantum logics, with the []^n p & <>^m t variants. Bruno > > LC > > On Friday, December 28, 2018 at 11:16:09 AM UTC-6, Jason wrote: > Frank Tipler wrote this 2005 paper, I am curious if others are familiar with > it, and what your thoughts on it are: > > https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-structure-of-the-world-from-pure-numbers-Tipler/3adcc70233813349ef6ee9779799780d813556e7 > > <https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-structure-of-the-world-from-pure-numbers-Tipler/3adcc70233813349ef6ee9779799780d813556e7> > > I found it to be quite interesting. He claims that the dream of quantum > gravity eliminating infinities from the standard model cannot succeed, and > also that the entropy of the initial conditions of the universe was zero. > > Jason > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > <mailto:everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com > <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list > <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
