Everything apparently, which makes it incompatible with mechanism, ironically enough. I am not convinced either that super-determinisms makes sense, but this requires more thought. I will take some time to read that book, but a first glance shows that it does not distinguish 3p, 1p, 1p-plural, so if mechanism is correct, something is necessarily missing. If QM is true and Mechanism is true, logicians and physicists should meet at the middle of the mind-body bridge, but ’t Hooft might depart a bit from the part of Everett which confirms mechanism. > > Not saying this theory is a good one, but a theory is a theory is a theory. Yes, that follows from x = x. We agree on everything apparently (despite working in antipodal conception of reality). Bruno > > - pt > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > <mailto:everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. > To post to this group, send email to email@example.com > <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list > <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.