On Friday, January 11, 2019 at 7:40:13 PM UTC, Brent wrote:
> On 1/11/2019 1:54 AM, agrays...@gmail.com <javascript:> wrote:
> *How can you prepare a system in any superposition state if you don't know 
> the phase angles beforehand? You fail to distinguish measuring or assuming 
> the phase angles from calculating them. One doesn't need Born's rule to 
> calculate them. Maybe what Bruce meant is that you can never calculate 
> them, but you can prepare a system with any relative phase angles. AG *
> In practice you prepare a "system" (e.g. a photon) in some particular but 
> unknown phase angle. Then you split the photon, or entangle it with another 
> photon, so that you have two with definite relative phase angles, and with 
> the same frequency,  then those two branches of the photon wave function 
> can interfere, i.e. the photon the interferes with itself as in the Young's 
> slits experiment.  So you only calculate the relative phase shift of the 
> two branches of the wf of the photon, which is enough to define the 
> interference pattern.
> Brent

*Can a photon be split without violating conservation of energy? In any 
event, I see my error on this issue of phase angles, and will describe it, 
possibly to show I am not a complete idiot when it comes to QM. Stayed 
tuned. AG* 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to