On Wednesday, June 19, 2019 at 5:04:26 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 18 Jun 2019, at 15:16, Philip Thrift <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
> In 
>
> *Embodied and disembodied computing at the Turing Centenary:*
> *Turing’s Titanic Machine?*
> by S. Barry Cooper
>
> http://www1.maths.leeds.ac.uk/pure/logic/computability/BarryTalks/titanic_CACM.pdf
>
>
> *As Samson Abramsky puts it (private communication communication, 2011):*
> *“Turing took traditional mathematical objects, real numbers, functions, 
> etc. as the things to be computed. In subsequent work in computer science, 
> the view of computation has broadened enormously. In the work on concurrent 
> processes, the behavior is the object of interest. There is indeed a lack 
> of a clear-cut Church-Turing thesis in this wider sphere of 
> computation—computation as interaction."*
>
> Add "(embodied) experience" to "interaction".
>  
> So there  is a *beyond-CT* suggested in all of this.
>
>
>
> With all my respect to Barry Cooper and Samson Abramski, what they show is 
> that there are other interesting notions, beyond computation.
>
> The provability notion is typically “beyond CT”, or beyond computation, 
> but they are Turing emulable, like all interaction-like notion of 
> computation are Turing emulable.
>
> And, yes, they are right, those notions does not admit a Church-Thesis. It 
> is just simpler to not call them computation. Those other notions does not 
> violate CT, and are often based on CT, more or less explicitly.
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
>
>
Just as G.Strawson says "matter is a mystery", computation (what is it?) is 
a mystery, except in the certitude of the *received doctrine* of 
Church-Turing Thesis.

But "there are other interesting notions, beyond computation" just leads to 
mysticism it seems, since *what are these "other interesting notions"?* 
What's an example of one these?

I know that neither you nor Cosmin will accept there is such a thing as 
*experience 
processing *(with entities - *experiences/qualia irreducible to 
information/numbers* - because it is *unconventional computing*, something 
it seems you don't think exists (even though there is an annual conference 
of it).

@philipthrift

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/73fc0684-b3ec-4a4f-b1c4-abab3ac63991%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to