On 8/2/2019 11:03 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
It is like Saibal Mitra said, the person he was when he was 3 is dead.  Too much information was added to his brain.  If his 3 year old self were suddenly replaced with his much older self, you would conclude the 3 year old was destroyed, but when gradual changes are made, day by day, common-sense and convention maintains that the 3-year-old was not destroyed, and still lives. This is the inconsistency of continuity theories.

On the contrary I'd say it illustrates the consistency of causal continuity theories.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/8e922e24-b96a-afe9-5957-5853c757baf0%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to