On 8/2/2019 4:59 PM, Jason Resch wrote:


On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 6:44 PM Bruce Kellett <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 9:36 AM Jason Resch <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 5:18 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything
        List <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            On 8/2/2019 1:41 PM, Jason Resch wrote:

                [Brent]One. It's a unitary evolution of the input state.


            We were speaking of computational states.  Are you saying
            there is only one computation state involved in Shor's
            algorithm?  What causes the interference necessary to
            yield the correct answer, if not these numerous
            computational states?
            The interference is in the measurement which Deutsch would
            say projects out onto one of the multiple worlds...the
            non-unitary step.


        Does anyone claim interference happens during the
        measurement?  In the double slit experiment the interference
        happens when the two photons overlap in their position, not
        when they strike the photographic plate.  Deutsch says as much
        in his introduction to Fabric of Reality when speaking of
        shadow selves and shadow photons.

        In any case, you have still managed to avoid the question of
        the reality of the 10^1000 intermediate computational states. 
        I won't press for an answer if you don't have one.


    Brent is correct. There is only ever one state -- one vector in
    Hilbert space. The computation involves nothing more than unitary
    rotations of this vector in Hilbert space. The final result is
    obtained by projecting this state on to some set of basis vectors.
    None of the intermediate projections on to arbitrary basis vectors
    is "real" in any sense, since such basis vectors are arbitrary.


A lot of computational work gets done for by something that isn't real in any sense.

The wave function is real (if you prefer the ontic interpretation)...but there's only one state described by it.


    So, in  that sense, the final measurement does do the interference
    because it involves a choice of a particular basis. Just as the
    spots on the screen behind a double-slit experiment decide the
    interference -- they amount to a choice of basis in position space
    -- position along the axis of the screen.


So the Morpho butterfly isn't sending out blue light until you look at it?

It isn't sending out blue photons until they interact with the environment.

Brent


Jason
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CA%2BBCJUi5GYR4XJ47SwTPVbw4Vi4JQrVadWeAWQOZpa5H6YiF7A%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CA%2BBCJUi5GYR4XJ47SwTPVbw4Vi4JQrVadWeAWQOZpa5H6YiF7A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a8261afa-e701-2a73-fae6-d9b815500f9c%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to