On Friday, September 13, 2019 at 8:28:10 AM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > Not for those of us who watch horseraces! Applied to QM, the wf becomes > irrelevant when the measurement occurs. Wave packet reduction, by which I > assume you mean "collapse", is nothing more than a bookkeeping device. AG > >> >> It's a matter of what is the right sort of *probability space* one wants to have to make this be the case.
*Quantum Dynamics without the Wave Function* https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0610204 @philipthrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/dc1a1d9d-43eb-420c-a991-07a28001dda2%40googlegroups.com.
