> On 16 Sep 2019, at 23:06, spudboy100 via Everything List 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Yes, Bruno, it's all axiomatic. Having said this, we can do away with MWI by 
> simply calling it all, an infinite (my term is near-infinite, a non 
> sequitur), and we still hypothetically receive the same results as chaotic 
> inflation, or the happy Hugh Everett, dance of worlds. From trans-cosmic 
> invaders from alternate Earths, I'd hope it would be from 3 different cosms 
> where other human species were successful. Dance with Denisovans, battle with 
> Neanderthals, do mathematics with Boskones (they gota be good at math with 
> those big heads?). We leave one discussion out of our thoughts. Which is how 
> many of these oblate spheroids that we split off to, are just empty vacuums, 
> or false vacuums? Thus, it's the internal content of any given cosmos that 
> matters. No minds (to me) equals non-consciousness, and that Swiss guy, 
> Schrodinger seems to agree with me. I'll just jot off and submit this to the 
> committee and await my Fields Prize. 

Not sure if we differ. It is a bit fuzzy to me to be honest. Good luck for the 
Fields Medal. If you are older than 40, it is no more possible (I let you know).

Bruno


> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruno Marchal <[email protected]>
> To: everything-list <[email protected]>
> Sent: Mon, Sep 16, 2019 1:25 pm
> Subject: Re: Another physicist in mental decline (Sean Carroll)
> 
> 
>> On 16 Sep 2019, at 02:46, spudboy100 via Everything List 
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> My guess is among the physics community, most, would be mildly, skeptical of 
>> MWI, because it's a bridge too far to get evidence of, as yet and thus, 
>> unconcerned.
> 
> 
> Hmm… I will criticise this on two levels.
> 
> 1) there are evidence: Nature loves to multiply things, and each time we said 
> that we know what our universe is, we get later that it was multiple. We have 
> believe that Earth was the world, then that the solar system was the world, 
> then that the galaxy was the world, then thanks to Hubble the guy, we 
> eventually accept what Kant did suggest, that our galaxies are themselves 
> multiple, and now we see them like little bacteria engulfed in filaments made 
> of a mysterious matter, along with an observable matter no less mysterious as 
> it implies a still bigger multiplication. 
> 
> 
> 2) Occam Razor. If you can explain everything with the axiom A and without 
> the axiom B, get rid of axiom B, especially if it put some mess in your 
> theory.
> The theory 
> 
> Mechanism + SWE 
> 
> is simply much more conceptually simple than the theory 
> 
> SWE + an ontological physical collapse of on ontological physical wave 
> (without mentioning the dualism in the implicit theory of mind).
> 
> Only one problem, for Mechanism to work, and notably to get the qualia 
> extending the quanta (like G* extend G, or Z1* extends Z1), we need to 
> re-prove constructively that Mechanism -> SWE, but there are promising result 
> (I dare to say) in that direction.
> 
> Yes, the less axioms you have, the more possibilities/models you get, and 
> with mechanism, there is a simple explanation why the possibilities have to 
> interfere at some point. 
> 
> The most plausible theory is Mechanism. You need only to believe in 2+2=4 & 
> Co. The appearance of the many worlds and they laws is explained from that, 
> and in a precise way so that it can be tested, and thanks to QM, it works, 
> and it explains the relation between qualia and quanta, consciousness and 
> matter, etc. Maybe wrongly, but that has to be shown.
> 
> There are zero universe, also. So we get the conceptual Occam (smaller 
> theory) and the ontological Occam, no physical universe at all, but a 
> universal dreamer (the universal machine lost in an incredible web of dreams, 
> some coherent up to make it able to say “hello” to itself, and develop 
> infinite conversations, like bacteria ...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Having said this, many cosmologists are still having a cat fight about the 
>> Hubble Constant (The rate of cosmological expansion). my suspicion is, that 
>> once we get to the point of hanging truly gigantic telescopes on the 
>> periphery of the solar system, new discoveries will be made, and revisions 
>> to old laws of physics will be done. We'll gain a few definitive answers 
>> through observation, and we shall see that quantum in action at a vastly 
>> large scale. Relatedly, hey!, where's my dark matter? in fact, hey!, where's 
>> my fusion reactors. Ah! So much for the 'mentally fit' physicists and 
>> astronomers….
> 
> 
> Nothing is simple. Not even Nothing.
> 
> Bruno
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Philip Thrift <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> To: Everything List <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Sent: Sun, Sep 15, 2019 7:03 pm
>> Subject: Re: Another physicist in mental decline (Sean Carroll)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sunday, September 15, 2019 at 5:46:13 PM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Sunday, September 15, 2019 at 3:34:10 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Sean Carroll's many-selves
>> 
>> And the good news is ... the one in this world is going bald. AG 
>> 
>> 
>> And (many would say) going crazy.
>> 
>> There is obviously (in his view) a world where a Sean Carroll is a "one 
>> world" quantum theorist. 
>> 
>> 
>> @philipthrift
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=zsXCwUsuvKo 
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsXCwUsuvKo>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> @philipthrift
>> 
>> On Wednesday, September 11, 2019 at 11:45:41 PM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote:
>> https://www.wired.com/story/ sean-carroll-thinks-we-all- 
>> exist-on-multiple-worlds/ 
>> <https://www.wired.com/story/sean-carroll-thinks-we-all-exist-on-multiple-worlds/>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/3b7a3a0d-b3e0-43ef-b886-c393eb35c9b0%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/3b7a3a0d-b3e0-43ef-b886-c393eb35c9b0%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/8643456.7738728.1568594779723%40mail.yahoo.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/8643456.7738728.1568594779723%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/DDAE2632-6951-443B-B64F-C15D92BD2C26%40ulb.ac.be
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/DDAE2632-6951-443B-B64F-C15D92BD2C26%40ulb.ac.be?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>  
> .
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1415449710.8186859.1568668017531%40mail.yahoo.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1415449710.8186859.1568668017531%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5243B739-AA25-418C-A73A-E539C1787C87%40ulb.ac.be.

Reply via email to