On Thursday, September 19, 2019 at 12:27:59 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: > > > > On 9/18/2019 10:44 PM, smitra wrote: > > On 18-09-2019 20:10, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List wrote: > > On 9/18/2019 1:33 AM, Alan Grayson wrote: > > But suppose you flip a coin and while it's in the air, you write its wf. > Since the prevailing belief is that all objects are quantum objects, why > can't one suppose that the two terms in the superposition, head and tail, > manifest quantum interference? AG > > > One clue that you can't is that magicians teach themselves to flip a > coin so that can always catch it the same way it started. That shows > it's not quantum randomness. > > Brent > > > > That only shows that in some cases its not random. But when it is random, > it can only be due to quantum fluctuations as there is no other form of > randomness in nature. > > > There's no other source of *inherent* randomness. There's plenty of > randomness from ignorance and there's randomness from the past light cone. > > Brent >
Event horizons may play a randomizing role. Quantum gravitation is likely a nonlocal field theory, whereas other gauge fields are localized as oscillators on spatial surfaces. Of course this is probably a manifestation of how spacetime is emergent from large Qu-Nit entanglements. LC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/64d97ef5-6b7c-4640-846b-0b90de25d787%40googlegroups.com.
