> On 24 Sep 2019, at 03:33, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 9/23/2019 4:23 PM, Jason Resch wrote: >> Yet, assuming an arithmetical world governed by arithmetical laws, you can >> derive the appearance of a physical universe governed by physical laws. > > If only it were so. So far it's hand waving aspiration.
Not all. We get first that a physical universe has to be perceive by the numbers, that explains why we believe in a physical universe, without ontological commitment. Only that is far better than an extrapolation from an ostentatious exhibit. Secondly, the proof is constructive. It says physics is given by those precise modes of self-reference. Thirdly, we get the full quantum logic, with testable difference (the arithmetical quantum logic has been shown richer than most physical quantum one). Fourthly, we get a theory of qualia and consciousness coherent with the prediction on pur first person experience, where physicalism, when rigorous, has to eliminate or dismiss qualia and consciousness. Physicalism has never work, except by denying the mind, but with Digital Mechanism, we know why, and we know how to improve/correct it. The real trouble are for those who defend both Mechanism and Materialism/Physicalism, be it with one world or many. Bruno > > Brent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a6a85605-97cf-52a3-a614-69e5a5ecc83f%40verizon.net. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/80DCDA40-4A38-481E-8ACF-D94E9E31AFCB%40ulb.ac.be.
