On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 12:16:57 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
> Many Worlds leads Sean Carroll to speculate about the morality of 
> duplicated selves when they bach off into other worlds.
>
> Sean Carroll
> @seanmcarroll
> https://twitter.com/seanmcarroll/status/1176617631408775168
>
> *Congressional votes do not *cause* the wave function to branch, but 
> unlikely quantum events can bring into existence branches where classically 
> unlikely outcomes have occurred. A nucleus might decay in the right 
> Representative's brain at just the right time, etc.*
>
> He asks:
>
> "If You Existed in Multiple Universes, How Would You Act In This One?"
>
>
>
> https://lithub.com/if-you-existed-in-multiple-universes-how-would-you-act-in-this-one/
> (From Something Deeply Hidden: Quantum Worlds and the Emergence of 
> Spacetime by Sean Carroll)
>
>
> But he gives away the game here:
>
> "To each individual on some branch of the wave function, life goes on just 
> as if they lived in a single world with truly stochastic quantum events."
>
> Maybe there's a Sean Carroll branch that loves stochasticity.
>

*How do you distinguish stochastic probability from quantum probability? 
AG *

>
> Many Worlds (a religion, or quasi-religion, but not science) is 
> fundamentally an anti-probabilities superstition. And anti-materialist as 
> well. Those who think we are pure information - platotonist bits - have no 
> problem with the idea of multiple copies of things here and now being made, 
> because there is no new material needed.
>
> (The religious aspect of Many Worlds has been made apparent with the 
> promotion - Carroll's own tweets, for example - of the book.)
>
> @philipthrift
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5f7de745-e562-4693-a355-48d00aa5e7f4%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to