> On 27 Sep 2019, at 09:35, Philip Thrift <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Friday, September 27, 2019 at 2:01:45 AM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
> 
> 
> Le ven. 27 sept. 2019 à 08:41, Philip Thrift <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> a écrit :
> 
> 
> On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 7:01:19 PM UTC-5, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 6:54:59 AM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
> It seems that nearly everyone on the list has a strong opinion about Sean 
> Carroll's new book, but has anyone other than me actually read it? 
> 
> John K Clark
> 
> I have not read his book, but I have read his papers and the one he 
> coauthored with Sebbens. I know what he has done. I am definitely agnostic 
> about MWI as I am with all interpretations. Carroll and Sebens has though 
> opened the door to a relationship between the Born rule and MWI, and I 
> suspect quantum interpretations in general. Now that is something I find 
> potentially very interesting.
> 
> LC 
> 
>  
> 
> See if Sean Carroll answers the question of "weighing" worlds:
>  
> How much is too Many Worlds, is it just right?
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/E3WLUdnW8jI/MLPg3dAhAgAJ 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/E3WLUdnW8jI/MLPg3dAhAgAJ>
> 
> 
> Suppose world W branches (in reality, not in "bookkeeping") to worlds W0 and 
> W1.
> 
> If reality is pure information (basically purely mathematical bits of 0s and 
> 1s), then that sort of "production" seems OK.
> 
> But what if W is (or contains) matter. Based on matter contents of W, W0, and 
> W1:
> 
> If the matter contents of W0 plus W1 combined is greater than the matter 
> content of W, how was the extra matter "produced"?
> 
> 
> Two answers so far:
> 
> 1. If an infinity of indiscernible universes already exist at the start and 
> are only differentiating/diverging (instead of splitting), then no matter is 
> created, all of it was already there.
> 
> 2. Differentiation rather that duplication of matter is one possibility, but 
> duplication of matter is not logically impossible either. Empirically, we 
> have that matter cannot be created, but that is within a single world.
> 
> 
> And you forgot 3- it's always the same matter in w0 and w1, just seen from 
> another POV, like a circle in a 2d plane could be thought to be from a sphere 
> or a cylinder intersecting a 2d plane, so if you see the many 2d planes 
> intersecting the cylinder, they see each a part of it, no new circle are 
> created on each plane.
> 
> Quentin
>  
> 
> 
> 
> Sorry I missed it. This is the first I've read that answer.
> 
> Keep them coming!
> 
> BTW Sabine Hossenfelder just posted her Many Worlds view:
> 
> http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2019/09/the-trouble-with-many-worlds.html 
> <http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2019/09/the-trouble-with-many-worlds.html>
> 
> @philipthrift


See my answer to spudboy. There is no matter, and 0 physical universe, just the 
computations emulated by the +/* structure of arithmetic; that is, all 
computations. That include the quantum one, but that does not explain the 
quantum one. To explain them, we have to prove that only them win the first 
indeterminacy problem in arithmetic (or there will be an appel to something non 
Turing emulable or first person recoverable.

But even with quantum mechanics, that problem can be solved, as the laws are 
statistical, and the universe never interact. Linearity precludes us to steal 
the oil in a parallel universe. Amazingly, if QM was not 100% linear (if the 
wave equation was only the first term of some series) we would be able to 
interact in between universe, but thermodynamic would get wrong, relativity 
would become wrong, well, nobody try this anymore.

Bruno


> 
>  
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/6c3c4f0f-b27f-4d2f-a196-1447e744615d%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/6c3c4f0f-b27f-4d2f-a196-1447e744615d%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/734D20A7-6BC8-427C-B851-116850090EA9%40ulb.ac.be.

Reply via email to