> On 27 Sep 2019, at 23:24, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 9/27/2019 12:35 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>> BTW Sabine Hossenfelder just posted her Many Worlds view:
>> 
>> http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2019/09/the-trouble-with-many-worlds.html 
>> <http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2019/09/the-trouble-with-many-worlds.html>
> Sabine writes:
> 
> The reason is this. In the many worlds interpretation, if you set up a 
> detector for a measurement, then the detector will also split into several 
> universes. Therefore, if you just ask “what will the detector measure”, then 
> the answer is “The detector will measure anything that’s possible with 
> probability 1.”
> 
> This, of course, is not what we observe. We observe only one measurement 
> outcome. The many worlds people explain this as follows. Of course you are 
> not supposed to calculate the probability for each branch of the detector. 
> Because when we say detector, we don’t mean all detector branches together. 
> You should only evaluate the probability relative to the detector in one 
> specific branch at a time.
> 
> That sounds reasonable. Indeed, it is reasonable. It is just as reasonable as 
> the measurement postulate. In fact, it is logically entirely equivalent to 
> the measurement postulate.
> 
> This turns on "we only observe one measurement outcome" and  this "...is 
> logically equivalent to the measurement postulate"  But the MWI says that we 
> observe all possible outcomes just as the detector measures all possible 
> outcomes.  She seems to elide the observer splitting, and assumes there's a 
> "soul" or "person" that doesn't split but instead goes to only one branch of 
> the MW.

Right, and that is the usual confusion between 1p and 3p, or between []p and 
[]p & p. It is the W-guy saying to the journalist in Washington: “let us forget 
the M-guy” as we are not in Moscow.

Bruno



> 
> Brent
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2b3361d2-b424-234a-6fc9-45e124355efc%40verizon.net
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2b3361d2-b424-234a-6fc9-45e124355efc%40verizon.net?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/77848733-BD8B-4BAB-9CF3-8ECE33F61512%40ulb.ac.be.

Reply via email to