Le ven. 27 sept. 2019 à 08:41, Philip Thrift <[email protected]> a écrit :
> > > On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 7:01:19 PM UTC-5, Lawrence Crowell > wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 6:54:59 AM UTC-5, John Clark wrote: >>> >>> It seems that nearly everyone on the list has a strong opinion >>> about Sean Carroll's new book, but has anyone other than me actually read >>> it? >>> >>> John K Clark >>> >> >> I have not read his book, but I have read his papers and the one he >> coauthored with Sebbens. I know what he has done. I am definitely agnostic >> about MWI as I am with all interpretations. Carroll and Sebens has though >> opened the door to a relationship between the Born rule and MWI, and I >> suspect quantum interpretations in general. Now that is something I find >> potentially very interesting. >> >> LC >> > > > > See if Sean Carroll answers the question of "weighing" worlds: > > *How much is too Many Worlds, is it just right?* > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/E3WLUdnW8jI/MLPg3dAhAgAJ > > > Suppose world W branches (in reality, not in "bookkeeping") to worlds W0 > and W1. > > If reality is pure information (basically purely mathematical bits of 0s > and 1s), then that sort of "production" seems OK. > > But what if W is (or contains) matter. Based on matter contents of W, W0, > and W1: > > *If the matter contents of W0 plus W1 combined is greater than the matter > content of W, **how was the extra matter "produced"?* > > > Two answers so far: > > 1. *If an infinity of indiscernible universes already exist at the start > and are only differentiating/diverging (instead of splitting), then no > matter is created, all of it was already there.* > > 2. *Differentiation rather that duplication of matter is one possibility, > but duplication of matter is not logically impossible either. Empirically, > we have that matter cannot be created, but that is within a single world.* > > And you forgot 3- it's always the same matter in w0 and w1, just seen from another POV, like a circle in a 2d plane could be thought to be from a sphere or a cylinder intersecting a 2d plane, so if you see the many 2d planes intersecting the cylinder, they see each a part of it, no new circle are created on each plane. Quentin > @philipthrift > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d1e6e335-079b-4fed-babe-5bf83afb5b07%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d1e6e335-079b-4fed-babe-5bf83afb5b07%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy Batty/Rutger Hauer) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAMW2kApZd08i97YwRKDD9yYGf%3DVNq0m5i2EHaDsNGKqkMwfEDA%40mail.gmail.com.
