> On 3 Oct 2019, at 18:37, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 10/3/2019 2:08 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >>> No, Bruce's point is that it must be present at the start. Otherwise Bell's >>> inequality couldn't be violated. >> Bruce agree that there is no FTL action, that is locality. The non locality >> is in the perspective view. It is not a global truth, as that is obvious if >> you agree that the wave function evolution is only a rotation in some space. >> Rotation are typically local, even in abstract spaces (which in Everett and >> with mechanism are the real thing). >> Now, with “one physical universe”, that non-local perspective implies some >> FTL action. > > Sure it's "local" in Hilbert space. But that's not what is violated in tests > of Bell's inequality.
No, but what is violated in Bell’s inequality is the idea that the state in Hilbert space describe a physical reality, when it describes only the relative first person plural sharable map of the computations/histories that they can access to, personally. See my recent post to Bruce. Bruno > > Brent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/af476db4-c91e-bebd-8498-42a26596f100%40verizon.net > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/af476db4-c91e-bebd-8498-42a26596f100%40verizon.net?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAE012E0-FC15-433B-8044-DB228A402871%40ulb.ac.be.
