This really is a well enough explained question. LC
On Thursday, October 3, 2019 at 5:24:15 AM UTC-5, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > Finding Sabine Hossenfelder there ... > > David Appell 10:49 PM, October 02, 2019 > > Can't one of you please tell us dummies how creating an entirely new > branched off world requires no new energy? > > None of the enlightened people here has stooped to answer this small but > significant question. They don't even try. Please try. Assume we're stupid. > > > > Sabine Hossenfelder 12:30 AM, October 03, 2019 > David, > > The reason that the "enlightened people" do not answer this question is > that it has been answered thousands of times and you could easily answer > your question by doing as much as asking Google. That you come here > nevertheless to ask this question, one more time, demonstrates that you are > not really interested in an answer but merely want to troll. > > Energy conservation is not violated because to correctly sum up the total > energy, you have to weigh the energy in each branch with the probability of > that branch. This works the way it always works in quantum mechanics. There > is nothing new going on here, nothing controversial, and nothing > interesting. > > > > http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2019/09/the-trouble-with-many-worlds.html?showComment=1569889923590#c1373154727748966620 > > @philipthrift > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/765fc985-b037-4267-b35c-171cd71aad91%40googlegroups.com.
