On Friday, October 4, 2019 at 8:12:38 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 3 Oct 2019, at 21:07, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < > [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > > > > On 10/3/2019 10:44 AM, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Thursday, October 3, 2019 at 12:39:09 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: >> >> >> >> On 10/3/2019 6:29 AM, Alan Grayson wrote: >> > Why would the energy of a branch be related to its probability of >> > occurrance? One can imagine a very low probability, so low that it >> > can't even contain copies of the experimenter. Totally ridiculous! AG >> >> It it's probability were zero would you still count its energy? >> >> Brent >> > > > > But MWI eliminates probabilities. > > > That's its problem. But it has to explain the appearance of > probabilities. > > > Everett extracts it from the first person indeterminacy is > self-superposition, which is the very idea of the MW or Many-histories. In > his long text, He uses Mechanism quasi-explicitly. Its only problem is > that he has to extracts the wave from *all* computation, and incompleteness > makes this happens. The “worlds” are just computations seen from the > self-aware creature supported by those computations. > > > Bruno >
That is a good analysis of Everett Many Worlds, which is in stark contrast to a materialist (observer-free) quantum mechanics. But Many Worlds is another indication of physicists leaving the material world behind and entering a world of immateriality. @philipthrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/44f02a8e-3b21-4ea5-acb8-5f7b1dfabd5e%40googlegroups.com.
