On 10/13/2019 7:36 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Sunday, October 13, 2019 at 12:00:53 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote:



    On Saturday, October 12, 2019 at 11:48:33 PM UTC-6, Alan Grayson
    wrote:



        On Saturday, October 12, 2019 at 11:30:19 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:



            On 10/12/2019 7:21 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


            On Saturday, October 12, 2019 at 8:07:46 PM UTC-6, Brent
            wrote:



                On 10/12/2019 5:46 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


                        What does "realized" mean? made real? 
                        Being real is a metaphysical concept.  Bohr
                        never said anything about components of a
                        superposition being real.  He famously said
                        “Physics is not about how the world is, it
                        is about what we can say about the world”
                        and “Everything we call real is made of
                        things that cannot be regarded as real.”

                        Brent


                    The latter comment is ridiculous. Aren't
                    protons, neutrons and electrons real?

                    Ask Bohr.  You never answer my questions; why
                    should I answer yours.

                    Brent


                What questions haven't I answered??? AG

                Scan up until you see this symbol "?"

                Brent


            I explained what "realized" means by giving an example;
            S's cat, alive and dead simultaneously.

            That's a representation in the theory.  Every measurement
            that "realizes" its state finds it to be one or the
            other.  So what's the operational significance of "being
            realized"?  Schroedinger's whole point was that an alive
            and dead cat is never /realized/.

            Brent


        As I previously suggested, since there is no operator that has
        those cat states as eigenstates, S's example was probably
        meant to falsify the then prevailing (and continuing)
        interpretation of superposition, as it leads to an absurdity.
        It's not just about the cat! But the case of spin could be an
        exception to my general claim that it's a fallacy to interpret
        a superposition to mean the system so described, is in all
        component states simultaneously. AG


    S's cat scenario was not simply about the fate of a cat. After
    all, we already knew a cat can't be alive and dead simultaneously.
    It must have been to show the fallacy of the prevailing
    interpretation of superposition. AG


Incidentally, as I pointed out in a previous discussion of this issue, decoherence doesn't help. Even though it is extremely rapid, say 10^(-20) sec, there is still a finite duration when, according to the standard interpretation of superposition, the cat it is alive and dead simultaneously. LC might see this as nit-picking, but it isn't. We know a cat cannot be alive and dead simultaneously regardless of the time duration, however short.

What are you talking about?  Even when someone dies in a hospital, hooked up to all kinds of electronic recording instruments, the time of death can't be determined to the second, much less 1e-20sec.

Brent

So this result, when apply decoherence, doesn't avoid the superposition fallacy illustrated by S's cat. It can be traced to the interpretation of the superposition of (|decayed> + |undecayed>) of the radioactive source. AG



            Also, I said I would get back to you about spin
            superpositions when I have time to research the issue.
            Other than those items, I honestly have no idea what
            you're complaining about. Try asking me again. AG
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to
            the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
            To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
            from it, send an email to [email protected].
            To view this discussion on the web visit
            
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/57880cde-6295-4459-95c5-2d5ecef15133%40googlegroups.com
            
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/57880cde-6295-4459-95c5-2d5ecef15133%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/f6b15402-e17f-4e85-8966-15ed4d2e6f88%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/f6b15402-e17f-4e85-8966-15ed4d2e6f88%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/861bc539-3d02-341c-dde2-e65aea9833b9%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to